Allowed
Manikandan.B v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCBail Appl./841/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014/18TH MAGHA, 1935
Bail Appl..No. 841 of 2014 ()
-----------------------------CRIME NO. 37/2014 OF BEKAL POLICE STATION , KASARGOD DISTRICT
PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED :
MANIKANDAN.B,S/O. CHOYI, AGED 33 YEARS, KALICHAMARATHINGAL, ALAKKOD, PANAYAL VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT ALLARANGA HOUSE KANIYANKUNDU, PERIYA.
BY ADVS.SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE SMT.ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM SMT.N.ASWATHY SMT.K.R.MONISHA
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BEKAL POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-02-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.
--------------------------------
Bail Appl. No.841 of 2014
Dated this the 7th day of February 2014
O R D E R
Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.37 of 2014 of the Bekal Police station for the offences punishable under Secs.323, 324 and 308 read with Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code, is in custody from 13.01.2014 and seeks bail.
used by the petitioner is recovered. Having regard to the relevant circumstances, I am inclined to grant bail but, subject to conditions to prevent recurrence of such incidents in future.
The application is allowed as under.
Bail Appl. No.841 of 2014 2
Petitioner is granted bail in Crime No.37 of 2014 of the Bekal Police station and shall be released (if not required to be detained otherwise) on his executing bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions:
(a) One of the sureties shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(b) Petitioner shall report to the investigating officer on every Saturday between 10.00 am and 12.00 pm until filing of the final report.
(c) Petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation.
(d) Petitioner shall not get involved any offence during the period of this bail.
(e) Petitioner shall not intimidate or
Bail Appl. No.841 of 2014 3
influence the witnesses.
(f) In case any of condition nos(b) to (e) is violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file application before the learned magistrate (until committal if any, and thereafter before the learned Sessions Judge, concerned) for cancellation of the bail granted hereby, as held in P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR 2006 SC 100) .
Sd/-
THOMAS P. JOSEPH JUDGE /True Copy /
P.A. To Judge
NS
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the 1st accused in an offence punishable under sections 308, 323, 324 and 34 of the IPC.
What conditions should be imposed on the granting of bail to the petitioner.
Whether bail can be cancelled on violation of conditions imposed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P.K. Shaji V. State of KeralaReferred¶35
P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR 2006 SC 100) · Who else cites this
MANIKANDAN.B
STATE OF KERALA
THOMAS P. JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court