Petitioners in a writ petition challenging a university matter withdrew their challenge by submitting that the petition had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and closed the writ petition without examining the contentions.
Writ petition closed without examining contentions as it is said to be infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/13TH KARTHIKA, 1935
WP(C).No. 391 of 2009 (V)
PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------1. DR. BINDU A.K., AMBATTU HOUSE, THRIKKARIYOOR P.O., THANKALAM, KOTHAMANGALAM. 2. DR. HERMON P.J., PALIYATH HOUSE, KOCHUPALLY RAOD, THOPPUMPADY. BY ADVS.SRI.C.HARIKUMAR SRI.ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU T.K. SMT.MADHURI ANAND
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE JOINT SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT ANEXURE, THIRUVANANTHAPURM 2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. 673 635. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SAREENA GEORGE R2 BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-11-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A. V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
=.===================~=.=
W. P. (C) No. 391 of 2009
=.===================~=.= Dated this the 4th day of November, 2013
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ
petition is closed without examining the contentions raised.
A. V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE.
nkm
Dr. Bindu A.K.
Dr. Hermon P.J.
State of Kerala
University of Calicut
A.V. Ramakrishnan Pillai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
