Sreekanth G. v. Headmistress, C.a.High School, Peruvamba
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by an employee seeking confirmation of his appointment as Full-time Menial. Citing a Supreme Court decision regarding compassionate appointments, the Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for appointment if a vacancy arose and he remained eligible.
What did the court decide?
Directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's case for appointment as Full-time Menial if a vacancy arises and he is otherwise eligible.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/13TH KARTHIKA, 1935
WP(C).No. 1775 of 2009 (J)
PETITIONER(S):
SREEKANTH.G, AGE 30 YEARS, S/O.GOPALAKISHNAN KARTHA, JYOTHI NIVAS, PAZHAMALAKODE PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT(S):
- THE HEADMISTRESS, C.A.HIGH SCHOOL, PERUVAMBA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- THE MANAGER, C.A.HIGH SCHOOL, PERUVAMBA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD.
- THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent management should be directed to consider the petitioner's case for appointment as Full-time Menial if a vacancy arises.
Whether a claim under Rule 51A affects the petitioner's eligibility for appointment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sreekanth.G
- respondent
The Manager, C.A.High School, Peruvamba, Palakkad
- respondent
The District Educational Officer, Palakkad
- respondent
The Deputy Director of Education, Palakkad
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court