N.Shabeeb v. Rta., Tvm
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed the writ petitions as they had become infructuous, granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition if a fresh cause of action arose.
What did the court decide?
Petitions closed; liberty granted to file fresh petition if fresh cause of action arises.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2013/26TH ASHADHA, 1935
WP(C).No. 20413 of 2007 (E)
PETITIONER(S):
N.SHABEEB, S/O. NISSAR, 5/123, GLAFFHIL, CHAKKALAMUKKU SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SHADIL SHABEER S/O. SHABEER, MANGULAM, MUTTADA P.O. TRIVANDRUM-25.
BY ADV. SRI.P.RAVINDRAN (SR.)
RESPONDENT(S):
1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. M.GOPAKUMAR, TC 50/1138, MANGALASSERY HOUSE, KARAMANA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Shabeeb
- respondent
Regional Transport Authority, Thiruvananthapuram
- respondent
M.Gopakumar
- respondent
State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam
- respondent
CJ Christy Leela
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court