The court closed a writ petition due to lack of instructions regarding pension scheme inclusion, granting liberty to the petitioners to reopen the matter at their discretion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2013/24TH ASHADHA, 1935
WP(C).No. 9471 of 2005 (C)
PETITIONER(S):
1. RAHMATHULLA P.P., GENERAL MANAGER, MANJERI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., MANJERI 676 121.
2. K.K.RAMACHANDRAN, CHIEF ACCOUNTANT, MANJERI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., MANJERI 676 121.
3. PARVATHI DEVI A., MANAGER, MANJERI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., MANJERI 676 121.
4. ABDULLA KUTTY E., MANAGER (RETIRED), MANJERI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., MANJERI 676 121.
5. V.M.IBRAHIM, ATTENDER, MANJERI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD. MANJERI 676 121.
BY ADV. SRI.M.P.PRAKASH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI 110 066.
2. THE CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND, SHRAM SAKTHI BHAWAN RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI-110 001.
3. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, P.B.NO.1806, ERANHIPALAM KOZHIKODE.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.DENU JOSEPH, ADDL.CGSC
R1 TO 3 BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL, SC, P.F. R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 9471 of 2005 (C)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'(S) EXHIBITS:
| EXT.P1 | COPY OF THE RESOLUTION, OPTION AND LETTER DATED 24.11.04. |
|---|---|
| EXT.P2 | COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22.6.2004 ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL OFFICE OF THE EPF COMMISSIONER. |
| EXT.P3 | COPY OF THE REPRSENTATION DATED 4.12.2004. |
| EXT.P4 | COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 4.12.2004 OF THE BANK TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. |
| EXT.P5 | COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.12.2004 OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. |
| EXT.P6 | COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20.12.2004 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. |
| EXT.P7 | COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.2.2004 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. |
RESPONDENT'(S) EXHIBITS:
ANNEX.R3(a) COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF PROVIDENT FUND MEMBERS. ANNEX.R3(b) COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF PROVIDENT FUND MEMBERS. ANNEX.R3(c) COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF PROVIDENT FUND MEMBERS. ANNEX.R3(d) COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF PROVIDENT FUND MEMBERS.
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
BKA
B.P. Ray, J.
====================================
W.P.(C)No.9471/2005
====================================
Dated this the 15th day of July, 2013.
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with the passage of
time, he has no instructions as to whether the petitioners have been
included in the pension scheme floated by the State Government or
not. Therefore, this writ petition is closed giving liberty to the
petitioners to re-open the same, if they so desire.
sl.
B.P. Ray, Judge.
Rahmathulla P.P.
K.K. Ramachandran
Parvathi Devi A.
Abdulla Kutty E.
V.M. Ibrahim
Union of India
B.P. Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
