Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Ajit Nair Vs Bar Council of India — Kerala HC (2013) — LawSathi Research

Home
Kerala HC
2013
Ajit Nair Vs Bar Council of IndiaAjit Nair v. Bar Council of India

Dismissed

Ajit Nair v. Bar Council of India

Kerala HC7 Nov 2013RP/808/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review Petition dismissed as infructuous because the underlying matter had already become infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/16TH KARTHIKA, 1935

RP.No. 808 of 2013

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19535/2013

----------------

REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION:

AJIT NAIR,

ADVOCATE, PERUMPRAL HOUSE, NARANGANAM (WEST) P.O. PATHANAMTHITTA-689 642.

BY ADV. SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNAN

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN WRIT PETITION:

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Ajit Nair
respondent
Bar Council of India
respondent
Bar Council of Kerala

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 7 Nov 2013 · November
Registered: 5 Oct 2013
Case no.: RP/808/2013

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from P.r.ramachandra Menon

E.a.Nisa Vs P.v.Narayanan
6 Nov 2013
Jose Vs Indu Lekha
6 Nov 2013
Suseela Dinakaran Vs Director, Kerala Fisheries Department
6 Nov 2013
V.Hamza Vs State Level Committee
7 Nov 2013

Cite this judgement

Ajit Nair v. Bar Council of India, RP/808/2013 (KL), decided on 7 November 2013.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Review Petition dismissed as infructuous on the grounds that the matter underlying the review petition had already become infructuous at the time of hearing.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

1. BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 21 ROUSE AVENUE, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, NEW DELHI-110 002.

2. BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BAR COUNCIL BUILDING NEAR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

R2 BY SRI.LEO GEORGE

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-11-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

PJ

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

========================

R.P. No. 808 of 2013

against judgment dated 5.9.2013 in W.P.(C). No. 19535 of 2013

Dated this the 7^th day of November, 2013

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that

the matter has become infructuous. The Review Petition is

dismissed as infructuous.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

kp/-

CNR

KLHC010381942013

Bench

P.r.ramachandra Menon

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

M/S Padma Agencies Vs Secretary to the Government and 4 Others

7 Nov 2013

Sidhik Vs the District Collector

7 Nov 2013