Disposed

Cochin Devaswom Board v. Deputy Secretary, Local Fund Audit

Kerala HC13 Dec 2013DBP/149/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a suo motu reactivation regarding the appointment of a Head for the Maramath Wing due to retirement, the Court noted that the Board intended to engage a consultant on a contract basis rather than by permanent deputation. The Court recorded this intention and directed the Board to decide the remuneration for the consultant and the expert committee members, before disposing of the matter.

What the court decided

AI extract

Cochin Devaswom Board Vs Deputy Secretary, Local Fund… — Company and Corporate | Kerala HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

¶4

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA

¶6

FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1935

¶7

DBP.No. 149 of 2013 ()

¶8

(IN THE MATTER OF CDB REPORT NO.177/13 - EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RETIREMENT - SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS INITIATED - REG.)

¶9

PARTIES:

¶10

COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶11

DEPUTY SECRETARY, LOCAL FUND AUDIT

¶12

BY ADV.SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON, SC, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD BY . GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.RENJITH ADV.KRISHNAKUMAR MANGOT, AMICUS CURIAE FOR OMBUDSMAN

¶13

THIS DEVASWOM BOARD PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

¶15

¶16

B.KEMAL PASHA, JJ.

¶17

¶18

D.B.P. No.149 of 2013

¶19

Dated this the 13^th day of December, 2013

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

¶22

Ramachandran Nair, J.

¶23

Learned Ombudsman, by CDB Report No.177/2013,

¶24

brought to the notice of this Court that there should be a proper arrangement to have a Head of the Department for the Maramath Wing of Cochin Devaswom Board in the light of the retirement of the then officer. Learned Standing Counsel for the Board, on getting instructions, submitted that the Board has decided to engage Sri.V.T.Raman Bhattathiripadu on contract basis and for forming expert committee, to go through the pending projects and complete the same. We record the same and the Board will proceed with accordingly. The Board will take

¶25

DBP.149/2013

¶26

: 2 :

¶27

appropriate decision for fixing the remuneration of Sri.Raman Bhattathiripadu and also the members of the expert committee.

¶28

DBP is accordingly disposed of.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)

¶31

Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE)

¶32

aks/13/12

¶33

// True Copy //

¶34

PA to Judge

Cochin Devaswom Board v. Deputy Secretary, Local Fund Audit

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Cochin Devaswom Board v. Deputy Secretary, Local Fund Audit

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.K.Abdul Nazir Vs Jayakrishnan.P.D.

M/S. Breeze Hotel Vs Chidambaram Chettiyar Trust

N.K.Sundaram Vs Edathikandy Nabeesu

Joint Director of Local Fund Audit Vs Secretary

Thanthri v. Vishnu Bhattathiri Vs the Devaswom Commissioner

Cochin Devaswom Board Vs Deputy Director, Lfa, Thrissur