G.Madanan v. K.S.E.B. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Court permitted withdrawal for representation submission. Pending representation disposal, revenue recovery proceedings stayed for two months.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed; revenue recovery proceedings stayed pending disposal of petitioner's representation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2012/3RD MAGHA 1933
WPC.No. 4519 of 2007 (K)
PETITIONER:
G. MADANAN, PROPRIETOR, EMGEE PLASTICS, MAMOOD PERUMPUZHA, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI
SRI.RAHUL VENUGOPAL
RESPONDENTS:
- KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, KUNDARA, KOLLAM.
- DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY MAJOR SECTION, CIRCLE OFFICE KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G. Madanan
- respondent
Kerala State Electricity Board
- respondent
Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, Kundara
- respondent
Deputy Chief Engineer, Electricity Major Section
- respondent
Asst. Engineer, Electrical Section
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court