Petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order. Counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous, and the court dismissed the petition on that ground without substantive reasoning.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/16TH KARTHIKA 1934
WP(C).No. 17783 of 2012 (W)
PETITIONER(S):
1. ANEESH KUMAR K.,
KUNIYIL HOUSE, P.O. PUTHOOR,
2. HARIS U.K., U.K. HOUSE,
NELLIPARAMBA, O.K. MURI P.O.,
BY ADVS. SRI.P.J.MATHEW, SRI.AJITH GEORGE.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
2. THE DIRECTOR,
3. THE SECRETARY, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, POOJAPPURA , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
R1 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.K.A. LOWSY. R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SC.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-11-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
W.P.(C). No. 17783 of 2012
Dated this the 7th day of November, 2012
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter bas become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
Kp/-
ANEESH KUMAR K.
HARIS U.K.
THE STATE OF KERALA
THE DIRECTOR, STATE COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING, KERALA
THE SECRETARY, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
