K.S.Mathew v. the Secretary, Rta, Idukki
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a one-line order dismissing a writ petition as infructuous without substantive reasoning or detailed discussion of facts or law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/8TH ASHADHA 1934
WP(C).No. 1246 of 2011 (E)
PETITIONER:
K.S. MATHEW, KURAKUNNEL HOUSE, KATTAPPANA.
BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR
RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI, PIN - 685 602.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI P.P.PADMALAYAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-06-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.SURENDRA MOHAN,J.
WP(C).No.1246 of 2011
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2012
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that this petition has become infructous.
Therefore the same is dismissed as infructuous.
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE
kkj
K.S. MATHEW
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI
K. SURENDRA MOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court