State of Kerala v. S.Syam
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition by State against a writ judgment directing it to disburse a sum 'if any'. Court dismissed review noting no error on face of record as petitioner had already collected balance amount.
What did the court decide?
Review petition dismissed; judgment dated 03-06-2011 stands affirmed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/17TH KARTHIKA 1934
RP.No. 982 of 2012 ()
---------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.36696/2010 DATED 03-06-2011
REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 IN THE WP(C) :
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT
- THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
- BUILDING AND LOCAL WORKS, PUBLIC OFFICE,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
What if any grounds necessitate interference with the impugned order dismissing the review petition filed by the State?
Whether the amount directed to be paid 'if any' warrants a review given subsequent settlement of dispute?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State of Kerala, represented by the Secretary, Public Works Department
- respondent
S. Syam
Coram
P.R. Ramachandra Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court