Thomas v. Omana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ directions under Article 227 for early disposal of pending partition and divorce petitions in Family Court due to delay. Court directed Family Court to dispose of cases early, within six months of respondent's appearance.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to dispose of Exts.P1 and P2 early, at any rate within six months of respondent's appearance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
&
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/20TH ASWINA 1934
OP (FC).No. 3339 of 2012 (R) ---------------------------IN OP.582/2012 of FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER(S):
THOMAS,, S/O KUNJAVARA, KODIYAN HOUSE, VAZHIAYAMBALAM KODAKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
OMANA THOMAS, W/O THOMAS, KODIYAN HOUSE, VAZHIYAMBALAM KODAKARA VILLAGE, POST MANAKULANGARA THRISSUR DISTRICT 680684
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court can be directed to dispose of pending partition and divorce petitions early despite non-appearance of the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THOMAS
- respondent
OMANA THOMAS
Coram
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court