Prakasan v. Raji
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an original petition challenging a Family Court order refusing to examine a Labour Officer to prove the wife's employment. The High Court found the party attempting to protract the matter and held no grounds for interference under Article 227.
What did the court decide?
The original petition was dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2012/4TH JYAISHTA 1934
OP (FC).No. 1447 of 2012 (R)
CRMP.NO.285/2012 AND CRL.M.P.NO.286/12 IN MC.33/2008 of FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR
PETITIONER(S):
PRAKASAN
S/O. SREEDHARAN, VAMBULLIKKUNNAN HOUSE RAMAVARMAPURAM, THRISSUR-680 631.
BY ADVS.SRI.YASH THOMAS MANNULLY
SRI.GEORGE POTHAN POOTHICOTE
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Article 227 of the Constitution of India warrants interference to examine a Labour Officer to prove the wife's employment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prakasan
- respondent
Raji
Coram
K.T. Sankaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court