V.J.Berly v. Frank Pius
Case brief
What is this about?
On admission, the High Court noted the dispute was amicably settled. It set aside the earlier attachment order, allowed the application to lift the attachment, and directed court intimacy to the Sub Registrar. The original petition was subsequently disposed of.
What did the court decide?
I.A No.687/2010 allowed; attachment before judgment set aside; courtesy intimacy to Sub Registrar directed; original petition disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/19TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
OP(C).No. 3928 of 2012 (O) -------------------------OS.127/2006 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOCHI
PETITIONER/DEFENDATN:
V.J.BERLY, S/o JOSEPH, AGED AGED 56, VALIYATHARA HOUSE, HOUSE NO.16/523 B KARUVELIPADY KOCHI-5.
BY ADVS.SRI.N.RATHEESH SMT.SUMA RATHEESH
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIF
-------------------
FRANK PIUS EARAVELI HOUSE, CULTS QUARTER, PERUMPADAPPU, KOCHI-6. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the attachment before judgment should be lifted upon settlement of the dispute
Whether the original petition should be disposed of upon settlement
Whether the subordinate court should be directed to intimate the Sub Registrar regarding the lifting of attachment
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.J.Berly
- respondent
Frank Pius
Coram
V. Chitambaresh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court