In a contempt of court case, the single judge dismissed the petition on the submission that a related representation was already disposed of on 3-5-2012, doing so without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge that earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/19TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1834 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/31752/2010 --------------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.31752/2010 DATED 02-03-2012
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
MARY DENCY P.R.,, AGED 35 YEARS W/O.JOSE.M.J,COMPUTER OPERATOR,REGIONAL CENTRE KERALA STATE NIRMITHI KENDRA KOTTAYAM AND RESIDING AT MUKALEL HOUSE,MANNANAM.P.O KOTTAYAM-686561.
BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.3 IN THE WRIT PETITION:
SHRI RAJEEV KARIYIL, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DIRECTOR,KERALA STATE NIRMITHI KENDRA,P.T.P.NAGAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695006.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MNS
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE-1: A TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 02.03.2012 IN W.P.(c) NO.31752/2010
ANNEXURE-2: A TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 06.03.2012 THROUGH REGISTERED POST WITH A/D BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER.
ANNEXURE-3: A TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.ADI/533/12/KSNK DATED 11.10.2012 APPOINTING SMT.JENCY P.M., CHEMMALA VEEDU, EDAPALLY-P.O.,KOTTAYAM-686578
ANNEXURE-4: A TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.ADI/169/11/KSNK DATED 30.03.2012 APPOINTING ISSUED BY ADMINISTRATION MANAGER
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P A TO JUDGE
V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
= = = = = = = = = = =
C.O.(C) No.1834 of 2012
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = =
Dated this the 10th day of December, 2012
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by the respondent that Ext.P12 representation was disposed of as early as on 3-5-2012. The Contempt of Court case is hence dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the said order dated 3-5-2012.
V.CHITAMBARESH. JUDGE
smm
2
Mary Dency P.R.
Shri Rajeev Kariyil
V. Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
