Saju v. Anil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a civil petition regarding a rent control order. The petitioner conceded that the hearing of the interim application has concluded and the original petition is now infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the original petition.
What did the court decide?
The original petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/19TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
OP(C).No. 3926 of 2012 (O)
OS.797/2012 of III ADDL. MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM (RENT CONTROL)
PETITIONER(S):
- SAJU P.V., AGED 32 YEARS AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.PAPPACHAN, PERUMBILYL HOUSE NETTOOR P.O.,ERNAKULAM.
- JOSEPH
- AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. XAVIER, KALLUR HOUSE NETTOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.B.AJOY
RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANT:
ANIL KUMAR SHARMA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saju P.V.
- petitioner
Joseph
- respondent
Anil Kumar Sharma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court