Zameera v. Salahudeen
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against joint compromise petition in matrimonial dispute. Court examined terms, found no illegality, and disposed of appeals per compromise.
What did the court decide?
Both matrimonial appeals disposed of in terms of the signed compromise petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/7TH KARTHIKA 1934
Mat.Appeal.No. 178 of 2012 () ----------------------------IN OP.510/2011 of FAMILY COURT,KOZHIKODE
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT:
ZAMEERA DAUGHTER OF LATE M.ASHRAF, AGED 47 YEARS RESIDING AT DOOR NO. 299, 1ST FLOOR EYE HOSPITAL BUILDING, THURAKKAL P.O. KONDOTTY-673638.
BY ADV. SMT.REKHA VASUDEVAN
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
SALAHUDEEN AGED 51 YEARS, SON OF LATE KOYASSAN, 50/1136 'C' ESRA 73, MASJID LANE, EDAPPALLY KANAYANNUR TALUK, EDAPPALLY NORTH VILLAGE COCHIN-682024.
R BY ADV. SRI.K.M.FIROZ R BY ADV. SMT.M.SHAJNA
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-10-2012, ALONG WITH MAT. APPEAL NO.179/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ZAMEERA DAUGHTER OF LATE M. ASHRAF
- respondent
SALAHUDEEN
Coram
PIUS C KURIAKOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court