Jimmy George v. Mohanlal
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case, the respondent submitted that prior directions were complied with. The court accepted the submission and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2012/13TH ASHADHA 1934 Con.Case(C).No. 812 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/18857/2008 -------------------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN .NO./ IN WPC.18857/2008 DATED
PETITIONER:
JIMMY GEORGE S/O.GEORGE, AGESD 37 YEARS, VALAKAMATTOM (H) CHEMMALAMATTOM P.O., PINNAKKANANDU. BY ADVS.SRI.C.M.TOMY SRI.MATHEW SKARIA SRI.K.J.JOSEMON
RESPONDENT: --------------
MOHANLAL AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN THE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA,SC,KSRTC BY SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA,SC,KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JIMMY GEORGE
- respondent
MOHANLAL
Coram
K.SURENDRA MOHAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court