Laila Joseph v. Mr.Reji P.Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
This order in a contempt case held that the respondent had not willfully disobeyed directions to initiate revenue recovery, as evidence indicated the alleged owner possessed no property in the enquired area. The case was closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed reserving liberty to the petitioner.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/27TH MAGHA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1257 of 2011 (S) -------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC.7311/2011 DATED 15-03-2011
PETITIONER(S): -------------
LAILA JOSEPH, D/O. LATE PETER, AGED 73 YEARS, ARAKKAL HOUSE, MULAVUKADU PO ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SMT.P.M.SWAYAM PRABHA SRI.ANIL KUMAR M.SIVARAMAN
RESPONDENT(S): --------------
MR.REJI P.THOMAS AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHASILDAR, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, ERNAKULAM 682 031.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MUHAMMED SHAFI. M
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-02-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was wilful disobedience of directions to initiate revenue recovery proceedings against the defaulter's immovable property.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Laila Joseph
- respondent
Mr. Reji P. Thomas
- respondent
Special Deputy Tahasildar
- respondent
Kerala State Financial Enterprises
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court