The Court directed the 2nd respondent to accept and register the original of Ext.P5 sale deed, granting the benefit of Ext.P3 notification, provided the document satisfies all other statutory conditions for exemption.
Directed the 2nd respondent to accept and register the original of Ext.P5 sale deed giving the benefit of Ext.P3 notification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
THURSDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2011 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1933
WP(C).No. 9244 of 2011(E)
PETITIONER:
P.V.JOSEPH KUNJU,
AGED 59, S/O.VARKEY, EF7/101, TILAK NAGAR, PAROTTUKONNAM, NALANCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-15.
BY ADV. SRI.V.SETHUNATH
SRI.PRAKASH KESAVAN
RESPONDENTS:
SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
W.P.(C) No.9244 OF 2011
Dated this the 26th day of May 2011
JUDGMENT
The Petitioner complains of the stand taken by the 2nd respondent in declining to register the original of Ext.P5 sale deed, giving him the benefit of Ext.P3 notification.
vdv P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Sub-Registrar is justified in declining to register the original of Ext.P5 sale deed despite Ext.P3 notification being in force?
Whether the 2nd respondent is directed to register Ext.P5 sale deed giving benefit of Ext.P3 notification?
P.V.JOSEPH KUNJU
STATE OF KERALA
SUB REGISTRAR
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
