Sharmila v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition challenged the delay in completing resurvey proceedings of the petitioner's property initiated in a prior order. The bench held that the Second Respondent must complete the resurvey as directed earlier and within one month from the judgment date.
What did the court decide?
The 2nd Respondent directed to complete the resurvey proceedings within one month from the date of receipt of the judgment copy.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2011 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1933
WP(C).No. 13057 of 2011(F)
PETITIONER:
------------------
SHARMILA, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O.RAJENDRAN, SHARMILA VILASOM, THURUTHUMOOLA MURI, PADMAVILASOM LANE, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS. SRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE SMT.P.V.PARVATHI SMT.REENA THOMAS SRI.L.RAM MOHAN
RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT-695001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Second Respondent is directed to complete the resurvey proceedings of the Petitioner's property expeditiously.
Whether the Petitioner was aggrieved by the delay in finalizing the resurvey application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sharmila
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
The Superintendent (Resurvey)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court