A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed as the petitioner failed to appear or file any representation despite notice being issued, resulting in non-prosecution by the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure of petitioner to file representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2011 / 14TH MAGHA 1932
WP(C).No. 7685 of 2006(M)
-------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
G.SREEDHARAN NAIR, ANITHA BHAVAN, EDAVACODE, SREEKARIYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.A.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------
1. D.MURALEEDHARAN, ANAND VIHAR, POWDIKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================
W.P.(C) NO. 7685 OF 2006
=====================
Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2011
J U D G M E N T
In this writ petition, notice was ordered as early as on 25.07.2006. Till date, process is not filed and besides, when the case is called, there is no representation either.
Writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp
G. Sreedharan Nair
D. Muraliedharan
The District Collector, Thiruvananthapuram
Anthony Dominic
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
