Issac T.Cheriyan v. Joy Abraham
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition, the court found that while respondent modified the fencing as directed, the petitioners residual dissatisfaction did not constitute disobedience warranting contempt proceedings, leaving open their right to seek further modification.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed. Judgment clarifies retention of right to seek further modification of fencing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2011 / 14TH MAGHA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 1537 of 2010(S) -------------------------------
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.24784/07)
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER
-------------------------------------------
ISSAC T.CHERIAN,AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.CHERIYAN,R/AT THEKKUMMEL HOUSE,PAYIPRA, MULAVOOR VILLAGE 686 673,REP.BY HIS P/A.H. AND FATHER CHERIAN,AGED 82 YEARS,S/O.ISSAC,THEKKUMMEL HOUSE, PAYIPRA,MULAVOOR VILLAGE 686 673.
BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM
RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether total dissatisfaction with residual fencing obstruction constitutes disobedience warranting contempt proceedings.
Whether the petitioners can seek further modification of the fencing after this order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ISSAC T.CHERIAN
- respondent
JOY ABRAHAM
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court