Suresh.K. v. Manoj
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed the contempt case as the petitioner was issued a clarification (Annexure-C) stating no permit from the Geology Department was necessary for mining ordinary earth under a specific Government Order.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Case was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 13TH MAGHA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 47 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------------[THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.37585/2010 DATED 20/12/2010] ....................
PETITIONER/PETITIONER: --------------------------------------
SURESH K, S/O.KUMARAN, AGED 42 YEARS, KANDAMPULLY HOUSE, PIDAVANNUR P.O., MOOKUTHALA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR.
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
--------------------------------------------------
MANOJ, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, TOWN BUS STAND COMPLEX, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678 001.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SURESH K
- respondent
MANOJ
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court