Petitioners' counsel urged dismissal by analogy to a prior dismissed writ petition. No substantive arguments or facts were recorded before the Court disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY
MONDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2011 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
WP(C).No. 13140 of 2005(L)
PETITIONERS::
BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ROCKEY
RESPONDENTS:
R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC SMT. LISHA M.G., GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) NO. 13140/2005
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
rv
B.P. RAY, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 13140 of 2005
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 19th day of December, 2011.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in this case is similar to that of W.P.(C) No. 36949 of 2004 which was dismissed by this Court on 07.04.2006. In the light of the aforesaid judgment, this writ petition is also dismissed.
sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE.
rv
O.P. No.
-:2:-
B.P. RAY, J.
O.P.No. 13887 of 2002
Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011.
JUDGMENT
GOPIKRISHNAN.V.K.
ANIL.T.N.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR
THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THRISSUR
B.P. RAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
