Jolly Thomas v. K.S.E.Board.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2011 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
WP(C).No. 24502 of 2005(P)
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
JOLLY THOMAS, CONSUMER NO.4636/TW, M/S.KAKKASSERY AUTOS, NADUVILANGADI, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN SRI.P.RAMACHANDRAN SMT.R.MEERA.
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. KERALA STATE ELECTIRCITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICIRY BOARD, TIRUR EAST, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ANTI POWER THEFT SQUAD, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS. SRI.JOSE J.MATHEIKEL, SC, KSEB FOR R1 TO R3 SMT.P.K.RADHIKA-KSEB FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. SANTHALINGAM, SC, FOR KSEB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ds
B.P.RAY, J.
J U D G M E N T
Prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire amount has been paid on protest. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed as infructuous.
B.P. RAY, JUDGE.
ds
JOLLY THOMAS, CONSUMER NO.4636/TW, M/S.KAKKASSERY AUTOS
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
B.P.RAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court