Union of India & 1 Others v. K.K.Hassan & Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition filed by respondents in an earlier writ petition challenging the designation of authority to examine Evidence Ex. P9. The court modified the earlier order to direct the correct authority to act.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the 3rd respondent to dispose of Ext.P9 within 8 weeks instead of the 2nd respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 5TH APRIL 2011 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1933
RP.No. 272 of 2011(D)
------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36036/2010 Dated 02/12/2010
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS
-----------------------------------------------------------
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
2. THE SECRETARY, RAILWAY BOARD, RAILWAY BHAVAN,NEW DELHI.
3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI.
4. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (WORKS), DISTRICT OFFICE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Railways
- respondent
The Secretary, Railway Board
- respondent
The General Manager, Southern Railway
- respondent
The Divisional Railway Manager (Works)
- respondent
The Area Manager, Ernakulam Junction
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court