Muhammed C.K. v. E.K.Gopalakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners failed to show requisite compliance. Contempt of court petitions were closed and disposed of by the Learned Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
MONDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2011 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 1511 of 2010(S) --------------------------------------------[THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.29529/2010 DTD. 24/09/2010] ....................
PETITIONER:
-------------------
MUHAMMED.C.K, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O. AMINA, CHAKKITTAKANDI HOUSE, PULIYAKOD.P.O, MELMURI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR.
RESPONDENT:
----------------------
E.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN, [AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER] THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/04/2011, ALONG WITH CON. CASE (C). NO.1512/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
prv.
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
CO.C Nos.1511/2010 &1512/2010
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 4th day of April, 2011
J U D G M E N T
Reported Compliance. Contempt Petitions are closed.
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
vi/
MUHAMMED.C.K
E.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court