A contempt of court case was admitted and disposed of without arguments on the basis of submissions recorded thereunto. Both parties admitted compliance with the judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2011 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 210 of 2011(S) -------------------------------------------[THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.2677/2010 DATED 16/02/2010] .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C): -----------------------------------------------------
P.A.PAILY, S/O.LATE P.A. AUGUSTINE, AGED 57, RETIRED INSPECTOR GRADE-1, KSRTC, PULLAMPRA PUTHANPURAYIL HOUSE,MONIPPALLY P.O, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SMT.SHAMEENA SALAHUDHEEN.
RESPONDENT/IST RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C): -----------------------------------------------------------------
SRI.SANJEEB KUMAR PADJOSHI, [FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER] MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,TRANSPORT BHAVAN,FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695 001.
BY SRI. V.V. NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, S.C, K.S.R.T.C.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/04/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
prv.
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
CO.C.NO.210 OF 2011(S)
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 4th day of April, 2011
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by both sides that the judgment is complied
with. Submission is recorded. Contempt Petition is closed.
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
vi/
P.A.Paily
Sri.Sanjeeb Kumar Padjoshi
Antony Dominic
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
