Hamza v. Yuseph
Case brief
What is this about?
In CRP No. 1985 of 2002, the petitioner failed to cure procedural defects after being directed to issue a registered notice. The court dismissed the civil revision petition for default as no response or compliance was received.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
MONDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2011 / 6TH ASHADHA 1933
CRP.No. 1985 of 2002()
---------------------AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08/07/2002 IN IA.952/2001 IN OS.311/1992 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOCHI
REVN. PETITIONER(S): DEFENDANT
HAMZA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT C.C.NO.3/872, NEAR CHAKKARIDDUKKU MOSQUE,(WESTERN SIDE), MATTANCHERY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE
RESPONDENT(S): PLAINTIFF
YUSEPH, S/O.KUNJIMOHAMMED, AGED 48 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT PAVATHIPARAMBIL, FORT KOCHI VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition can be dismissed for default when defects are not cured.
Whether the petitioner can be given an opportunity to issue a registered notice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hamza
- respondent
Yuseph
Coram
K.T. Sankaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court