Allowed

Krishna Pai & Another v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC24 Jun 2011Bail Appl./4743/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala granted anticipatory bail to accused persons for offences under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 66, 67 IT Act, directing police to release them upon execution of bond and conditions such as reporting to IO and not influencing witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted upon execution of bond for Rs. 25,000 with two solvent sureties each for Rs. 25,000, subject to specific conditions including reporting weekly and availability for interrogat

Krishna Pai & Another Vs State of Kerala — Domestic Violence | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2011 / 3RD ASHADHA 1933

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 4743 of 2011()

¶6

¶7

CRIME NO. 856/2011 of HILLPALACE POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM

¶8

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 & 3:-

¶9

¶10

KRISHNA PAI, 154, KUPPATTU, MATHETHARA NAGAR, RAMANKULANGARA, KOLLAM.

¶11

VASUNDHARA KRISHNA PAI, 154, KUPPATTU, MATHETHARA NAGAR, RAMANKULANGARA, KOLLAM.

¶12

BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER

SMT.M.JAYASREE

RESPONDENT:

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶17

ADV. SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶18

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶20

..............................................

¶21

B.A. No. 4743 of 2011

¶22

................................................ Dated this the 24^th day of June, 2011.

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners who are accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No. 856 of 2011 of Hillpalace Police Station, Ernakulam for an offence punishable under Section 498-A I.P.C read with Sections 66 and 67 of IT Act, seek anticipatory bail.

¶25

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶26

After evaluating the factors and parameters which are to be taken into consideration in the light of paragraph 122 of the verdict dated 2-12-2010 of the Apex Court in Siddharam

¶27

Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2010 (4) KLT 930) , I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officerin-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for `25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions:

¶28

B. A.No.4743/2011

¶29

-:2:-

¶30

Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays till the filing of the final report.

¶31

Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶32

Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶33

Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶34

The bail granted pursuant to this order shall be in force till the end of the trial of the case unless and until it is cancelled by this Court in accordance with paragraph 103 of the verdict in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre's case (supra).

¶35

If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶36

This application is allowed as above.

¶37

Dated this the 24^th day of June, 2011.

¶38

sd/- V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶39

¶40

//True Copy//

¶41

P.A to Judge.

Krishna Pai & Another v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Pai & Another v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lithin Prakash & Others Vs State of Kerala

C.G.Saseendran Vs Mathew Exal,Sub Inspector,Kottayam

Karmily Vs Suresh Babu

Reshma Susheelan Vs State of Kerala

Devi and Another Vs State of Kerala

Roy Vs the State of Kerala