The Single Judge of the Kerala High Court refused anticipatory bail to the petitioner, directing her to surrender for interrogation by the police first.
Petitioner directed to surrender for interrogation; conditional bail to be framed by the Magistrate after interrogation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2011 / 3RD ASHADHA 1933
Bail Appl..No. 4809 of 2011()
-----------------------CRIME NO. 390 OF 2011 OF MANGALAPURAM POLICE STATION
PETITIONER/ACCUSED
RESHMA SUSHEELAN,D/O.ACHAMA SUSHEELAN, TC 78/1895,LITTLE FLOWER HOUSE,KOCHU THOPP, VALLAKADAVU.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.V.S.THOSHIN
RESPONDENT(S): STATE
STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,MANGALAPURAM POLICE STATION,REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
.........................................
Bail Application No. 4809 of 2011
..........................................
Dated: 24-06-2011
ORDER
Petitioner who is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 390 of 2011 of Mangalapuram Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District for offences punishable under Sections 324, 307 read with Sec. 34 of I.P.C. and Sec. 27 of the Arms Act, seeks anticipatory bail.
B.A.No. 4809 of 2011
-:2:-
be produced before the Magistrate or the Court concerned and permitted to file an application for regular bail. In case the interrogation of the petitioner is without arresting the petitioner, the petitioner shall thereafter appear before the Magistrate or the Court concerned on the same day or on the next day and apply for regular bail . The Magistrate or the Court on being satisfied that the petitioner has been interrogated by the police shall, after hearing the prosecution as well, release the petitioner on bail.
1. Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays till the filing of the final report.
2. Petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who is acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him or her from disclosing any information to the Court or to the police or to any other person in authority.
B.A.No. 4809 of 2011
-:3:-
3. Petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation as and when required by the police at any time till the filing of the final report.
4. Petitioner shall not establish any contact with any of the witnesses or accused in the case.
5. Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses or the victims nor shall she attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.
6. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.
7. Petitioner shall notify to the Court her place of residence before executing the bail bond.
8. In case the petitioner commits breach of the above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner shall be liable to be cancelled.
This petition is disposed of as above.
Dated this the 24th day of June, 2011.
Sd/-V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE
ani/
/true copy/
P.S. to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the second accused in a case involving offences under Sections 324, 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and OthersRelied on¶2
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2011) 1 SCC 694 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Reshma Susheelan
State of Kerala
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
