In a finally heard contempt case, the court closed the petition allowing the petitioner to seek remedies against the order rejecting his mutation application.
(contempt petition closed)
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 123 of 2011(S)
--------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32546/2010 DATED 26/10/2010
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC
------------------------------------------------
RAVEENDRANATHAN, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.MACHATT MANICKAN, IRINJALAKUDA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
RESPONDENT/IST RESPONDENT
------------------------------------------------
BALAKRISHNAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, NOW WORKING AS TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, IRINJALAKUDA.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.RANI DIOTHIMA.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================
Cont. Case (C) NO. 123 OF 2011
=======================
Dated this the 25th day of February, 2011
J U D G M E N T
In view of the fact that an order has been passed rejecting the application of the petitioner for effecting mutation, the contempt petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to
seek remedies against the said order.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp
RAVEENDRANATHAN
BALAKRISHNAN
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
