Kalasakkaran Latha v. K.v.Usha
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitioner challenged the respondent's failure to grant a building permit despite a prior consent order. The Court closed the contempt proceedings, holding that insisting on Town Planner approval did not violate the prior judgment, as such approval remained necessary.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed. Petitioner directed to move the Town Planner for approval and then pursue the matter before the respondent.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
MONDAY, THE 14TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 25TH MAGHA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 1117 of 2010(S)
-------------------------------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
-----------------------------------------
KALASAKKARAN LATHA, D/O.KUNHAMBU, ALANTHATTA, VALIYAPOYIL P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.1:
-----------------------------------------------------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's insistence on Town Planner approval amounts to wilful disobedience of the High Court's earlier judgment directing consideration of the building permit application.
Whether the petitioner has shown that Town Planner approval is unnecessary for granting the permit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KALASAKKARAN LATHA
- respondent
K.V.USHA
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court