submits that in the morning practical examination will be evaluated at two stations by two sets of examiners and that in the afternoon the viva examination will be conducted at four different stations, each examiner sitting separately. It is stated that after completion of both examinations, all the four examiners will sit together and will add the marks together for each student. According to the University, out of the total students, the marks of the failed students will be taken again and their performance will be again discussed by the examiners and that finally, only a very few students whose performance at the examination was not up to the standard alone fail. It is stated that in the said process chances of subjective variation of marks is much less as compared to theory papers where evaluation is done by a single examiner and that it was therefore that after considering various aspects, the Pass Board decided not to award grace marks for practical examination. It is submitted that this recommendation of the Pass Board was made to the Controller of Examinations, who in turn placed the matter before the Syndicate of the University and it was with the approval of the Syndicate that the results were published. Therefore, according to the University in terms of the Regulations, they have exercised the discretion vested in them and therefore, the petitioners cannot claim that they
