Contempt petitioner sought admission of a petition to challenge an order passed in a writ case. The court closed the contempt petition maintaining rights to challenge the underlying order separately.
Contempt petition closed without prejudice to rights to challenge the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2011 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 1056 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.20857/2011 Dated 01/01/2011
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -----------------------------------------
MOHAN MATHEW, S/O.LATE MATHAI MATHEW, 58 YEARS, KADAVIL HOUSE, KAMBAZHI P.O., KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA. REP.BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AND WIFE ANNAMMA MOHAN.
BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SMT.RASHMI RAVINDRAN SMT.THUSHARA D.S.
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
------------------------------------------------
SRI.K.JAMES JOHN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER TAHSILDAR, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA. 689 641.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
tss
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES
A1:-TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.6.2011 BY THE PETITIONER. A2:-CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.8.2011 IN W.P.(C) 20887/2011. A2(a). TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT OBTAINED FORM THE RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
NIL:-
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
tss
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================
Cont.Case (C) NO. 1056 OF 2011
========================
Dated this the 27th day of October, 2011
J U D G M E N T
Learned Government Pleader submits that in pursuance to the directions in Annexure A2 judgment, proceedings have been issued on 24/9/11 and that the same has been communicated to
the petitioner.
Therefore, the contempt petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order now passed.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp
MOHAN MATHEW
SRI.K.JAMES JOHN
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
