Dismissed
Shijimol V.K v. Vidhya
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1018/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 1018 of 2011(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25029/2011 Dated 20/09/2011 ....................
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WPC:
---------------------------------------------------------
SHIJIMOL V.K., W/O.RAGHUNATHAN, AGED 37 YEARS, PUTHANKULAMBU HOUSE, ELAVAMPADAM P.O., ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABY MATHEW
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WPC:
------------------------------------------------------------------
VIDHYA, FATHER'S AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER VILLAGE OFFICER, KIZHAKKENCHERY NO.II VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT678541.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COC NO.1018/11
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE 1: TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 20/9/11 IN WPC NO.25029/11 ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Rp
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================
Cont.Case (C) NO. 1018 OF 2011
=====================
Dated this the 25th day of October, 2011
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order has been complied with. Recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp
SHIJIMOL V.K.
VIDHYA
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court