This review petition sought to challenge a prior judgment. The High Court rejected the request for review noting no error warranting it, but issued a clarification to ensure the Panchayath's statutory powers under the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994 remain exercisable.
Review petition dismissed with a clarification regarding Panchayath statutory powers.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2011 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1933 RP.No. 773 of 2011(U)
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25569/2011
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/STRANGER & THE 3RD RESPONDENT:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. POYYA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, POOPATHI P.O., POYYA, MALA, THRISSUR DIST., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. DAISY THOMAS AGED 38 YRS, W/O THOMAS.T.A., THEKKUMTHALA HOUSE, MADATHUMPADY.P.O., THRISSUR DIST.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH
SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.JAGAN GEORGE SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD SRI.P.G.PRAMOD SRI.ONEAL SABU
RESPONDENT(S)/ PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1,2 &4 IN THE WRIT PETITION:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. VINOY.T.S., AGED 39 YRS, S/O. SEBASTIAN,
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR COLLECTORATE,
3. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALA POLICE STATION, MALA, THRISSUR – 680 732.
4. THOMAS.T.A., THEKKUMTHALA HOUSE MADATHUMPADY.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT – 680733.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
STU
RP.No. 773 of 2011(U)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL
//TRUE COPY/
P.A TO JUDGE.
STU
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
R.P. No. 773 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 25569 OF 2011
Dated this the 24th day of October, 2011
O R D E R
Review of the judgment in WP(C) No. 25569 of 2011 is sought for by the first petitioner who is not a party to the judgment and the 2nd petitioner who was the 3rd respondent in the writ petition and who however did not enter appearance when the case was heard.
R.P. No. 773 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 25569 OF 2011
:2 :
that the observations in the judgment it will not in any manner prevent the Panchayath from exercising the statutory powers which are conferred on it under the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994.
With this clarification the review petition is disposed
of.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
ul/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can review a judgment to clarify that statutory powers of the Panchayath remain unimpeded.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
POYYA GRAMA PANCHAYATH & ANR
VINOY.T.S. & ANR
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
