Lithin Prakash & Others v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Court refused anticipatory bail in a case punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 307 & 506 (II) IPC read with Section 149 IPC. Order to surrender for interrogation to seek regular bail after interrogating.
What did the court decide?
Surrender date fixed for 04/07/2011 or 05/07/2011. If arrested, apply for regular bail. If not arrested, appear same day or next day for regular bail. Release on bond and conditions if interrogated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2011 / 2ND ASHADHA 1933
Bail Appl..No. 4724 of 2011()
----------------------------CRIME NO.1850/2011 OF CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKUALM
PETITIONERS:ACCUSED
- LITHIN PRAKASH, S/O.PRAKASH, CHITTEYIL HOUSE, KAKKATHURUTH, ERAMALLOOR POST, CHERTHALA
- AMAL, S/O.P.K.PUSHKARA, PULLARKAT HOUSE, MADAPLAMTHURURTH MOOTHAKUNNAM P.O.,
- VISHNU VENUGOPAL, S/O.VENUGOPAL, KAVUNGAPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHANGAMPUZHA ROAD, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI-24
- SARANJITH C.M,S/O.MAHESHAN C.K., CHURULATHARA HOUSE, EDAVANAKAD P.O., ILLATHUPADY,
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted without interrogation.
What direction can be given to accused to seek regular bail.
What conditions can be imposed on the release of accused on bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Akicious Persons (Lithin Prakash, Amal, Vishnu Venugopal, Saranjith C.M, Anoop P., Shan V.S)
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
V. Ramkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court