Komalam v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition held infructuous by the learned counsel for the petitioners on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2010 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1932
WP(C).No. 521 of 2007(K) -----------------------------
PETITIONERS:
---------------
1. KOMALAM, W/O.VIDYASAGAR, THUSHARA HOUSE, SANTHI KOLONY, CHANDRA NAGAR PO, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2. RASHEED KHAN, S/O.ALIKHAN, RESIDING AT 19/162, MURIKKAVU, WEST EKARA, EKARA AMSAM DESHAM, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
3. HAKKIM, S/O.CHELLA, RESIDING AT 8/442, VADAKUMMURI, KALAMANDPURAM, KUNNANUR AMSOM, KUNNANUR DESAM, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
4. PREMADAS, S/O.VELAYUDHA, PARAKAL HOUSE, ENNAPPADAM, ILAPPULLY POST, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KOMALAM
- petitioner
RASHEED KHAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court