The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order extending a quarrying permit to the fourth respondent. On hearing, the court observed the permit period had long expired and the petition, not amended to seek further relief, was time-barred and infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2010 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1932
WP(C).No. 2626 of 2010(C)
PETITIONER(S):
VINU P.V., AGED 32, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, PEDIKATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, ALOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH)
RESPONDENT(S):
ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ FOR R4
GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K. RAMESH.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
S. Siri Jagan, J.
W.P(C) No. 2626 of 2010
Dated this, the 25th day of May, 2010. J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the orders extending the quarrying permit given to the 4th respondent till 31-12010. That period is long over. The petitioner has not chosen to amend the writ petition seeking any further relief. Since the writ petition as presently constituted has become infructuous, the same is dismissed as infructuous.
Tds/
[TRUE COPY]
P.S TO JUDGE.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the extension of quarrying permit is maintainable.
VINU P.V.
THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR
THE TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK OFFICE
THE VICAR, ST.ANTONY'S CHURCH, KANAKAMALA P.O.
S. SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
