K.T.Rajappan v. K.S.R.T.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought a writ to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the additional 4th respondent. The additional respondent retired on 31/03/2010. The court held that no disciplinary action can be taken post-retirement and dismissed the writ petition due to time lapse.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of the writ petition as the additional 4th respondent had retired on 31.03.2010, precluding disciplinary action.