In a contempt proceeding, the court closed the case noting that the respondent had complied with the underlying judgment dated 5.6.2010, leaving open remedies available to the aggrieved petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2010 / 21ST JYAISTHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 567 of 2010(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.123/2010 Dated 19/01/2010 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC
E.T.DEVASSY,S/O.CHANKAN THOMAN, EDASSERY HOUSE,PALAYAMPARAMBU PO, THRISSUR DT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT -------------------------
NISARUDHIN,FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHALAKUDY.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
Cont. Case (C) No. 567 of 2010
Dated this the 11th day of June, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that orders have been passed in compliance of the judgment on 5.6.2010. In view of the above, leaving open the remedies that are available to the petitioner, if he is aggrieved, this contempt case is closed.
ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE.
nj.
E.T.DEVASSY
NISARUDHIN
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
