Narayanan Nair v. T.N.Babu
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petitioner challenged writ petition judgment relying on Geologist's report alleging factual inaccuracies. Court rejected review plea, noting petitioner never objected to the report earlier.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition judgment remain in force; further steps for environmental impact assessment study to be taken by District Collector.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2010 / 22ND ASHADHA 1932
RP.No. 581 of 2010(G)
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.8708/2009 Dated 01/03/2010
REVIEW PETITIONER/5TH RESPONDENT:
NARAYANAN NAIR, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.R.NARAYANAN NAIR, PERUMPILLI VEEDU, KALAMPOCRT, PIRAVOM.
BY MR.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM, KOTTAYAM.
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS1-4:
- T.N.BANU, THEKKUMKATTIL, MEVELLOOR, VELLOOR VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 501.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether facts in the Geologist's report justify recalling the directions issued in the writ petition.
Whether there is apparent error in the impugned judgment warranting intervention against Geologist's report.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Narayanan Nair
- respondent
T.N. Banu
- respondent
District Collector, Ernakulam
- respondent
Revenue Divisional Officer, Muvattupuzha
- respondent
Geologist, Mining and Geological Department
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court