In a contempt case, the court accepted the petitioner's submission that previous directions were complied with, leading to the closure of the contempt proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
THURSDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2010 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 1569 of 2009(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20781/2009 Dated 31/07/2009 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WPC: -------------------------------------
MURALEEDHARAN NAIR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.VASUDEVAN NAIR, ARUNODAYAM, MANNAR P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.VINOD J.DEV SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT NO.2 IN THE WPC:
VENUGOPAL (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.K.R.DEEPA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Contempt of Court Case No.1569/2009-S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dated this the 20th day of May, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directions issued by this Court in Annexure-I Judgment have been complied with. Therefore, the Contempt of Court
Case is closed.
ms
\TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
Muralleedharan Nair
Venugopal
District Collector Alappuzha
T.R. Ramachandran Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
