Disposed

S.K.Pannerselvam v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC18 Nov 2010Bail Appl./7146/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC (implied) for an offence under Section 498A IPC. The court refused anticipatory bail but directed the petitioner to surrender for interrogation before the Magistrate considers the regular bail application.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail denied; petitioner directed to surrender for interrogation on 29.11.2010 or 30.11.2010.

S.K.Pannerselvam Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 7146 of 2010() -----------------------------------------CMP.NO.3346/2010 OF SESSIONS COURT, PALAKKAD

¶6

.... (CRIME NO.914/2010 OF OTTAPALAM POLICE STATION,PALLAKKAD DIST.) .......

¶7

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1: -------------------------------------------

¶8

S.K.PANNEERSELVAM, S/O.KUPPUSWAMY, AGED 40 YEARS, SALAPALAYAM, REDDIPATTY P.O., NAMAKKAL DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU STATE.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN

¶10

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------------

¶11

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, REPRESENTING SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OTTAPALAM IN CRIME NO.914/2010.

¶12

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ

¶13

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

Kss

¶15

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶16

B.A. No. 7146 of 2010

¶17

Dated this the 18^th day of November, 2010. ORDER

¶18

Petitioner who is the first accused in Crime No. 914 of 2010 of Ottapalam Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 498(A). I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶20

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on 29.11.2010 or on 30.11.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioner has been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶21

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶22

Dated this the 18^th day of November, 2010.

¶23

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶24

S.K.Pannerselvam v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.K.Pannerselvam v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lenin Vs State

Kenny Vs State of Kerala

Biju Vs State of Kerala

Sreejith N.K. and Another Vs the Station House Officer Nileshwar P.S.

Sajan Vs State

Asokan Vs State of Kerala and Another