Sajan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application under Sections 489B and C IPC, the petitioner, fifth accused in a criminal case, sought enlargement. The court dismissed the petition due to the gravity of the offence, economic stability threat, and likelihood of flight and witness intimidation.
What did the court decide?
Bail was not granted to the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 6868 of 2010()
----------------------------CRIME NO.375/2010 OF NEDUMKANDAM POLICE STATION CRMP.4920/2010 of J.M.F.C.,NEDUMKANDOM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5
SAJAN, AGED 34 YEARS KODIYATTU VEEDU, PERINGALLOOR BHAGOM AYOOR KARA, EDAMULAKKAL VILLAGE PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV
RESPONDENT(S):
STATE OF KERALA REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM (CRIME NO,375/2010 OF NEDUMKANDAM POLICE STATION, IDUKKI.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, accused of possessing fake currency notes, is entitled to bail given the gravity of the offence.
Whether the inquest report does not guard the accused from the threat posed by prosecution witnesses.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAJAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V.RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court