Lenin v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The court refused anticipatory bail in a cheating and forgery case but directed the accused to surrender for interrogation before the investigating officer on specific dates. The bail application will then be considered by the Magistrate.
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail not granted; applicants directed to surrender for interrogation and apply for regular bail subsequently.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 6815 of 2010() --------------------------------------( CRIME NO. 472/2010 OF NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION, TRICHUR DIST ) -----------------
APPLICANTS/ACCUSED 1&2
-----------------------------------------
1. LENIN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.APPUNNY, ARANGATH HOUSE, VADANAPALLY VILLAGE, THRISSUR. 2. MANDAKANI, AGED 34 YEARS, W/O.LENIN, ARANGATH HOUSE, VADANAPALLY VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY SRI.P. VIJAYA BHANU, SENIOR ADVOCATE ADV. SRI. REVIKRISHNAN SRI. UNNI SEBASTIAN KAPPEN
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE S.I. OF POLICE, NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case involving offences under Sections 415, 420, 463 etc. IPC
Whether the petitioners can be permitted to surrender for interrogation before considering the regular bail application
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Lenin
- applicant
Mandakani
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court