The High Court of Kerala dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by Unnikrishnan on the ground that it had become infructuous as the petitioner was already released on bail by the trial court. No new legal principles were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 686 of 2010() ---------------------------CRIME NO.201/09 OF MANGALAPURAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
(S): PETITIONER:
------------------------------UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O.GOVINDAN PILLAI, AGED 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT UMA VIHAR, KURAKKANNI, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.J.S.AJITHKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBILC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.HEMA, J.
Bail Application No.686 of 2010
Dated 2nd June, 2010.
O R D E R
This petition is for anticipatory bail.
petitioner is already released on bail by the trial court. Hence, this petition has become infructuous.
Petition is dismissed.
K.HEMA, JUDGE.
tgs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application requiring fresh grant should be allowed when petitioner is already released on bail by the trial court.
UNNIKRISHNAN
STATE OF KERALA
K.HEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
