Disposed

Apple a Day Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC1 Jun 2010Bail Appl./2693/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application regarding offences under Sections 406, 420, and 120B IPC. The Court declined to grant anticipatory bail but permitted surrender for interrogation before considering regular bail. The application was disposed of with the petitioner required to surrender for police interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners permitted to surrender before IO on 09.06.2010 or 10.06.2010 for interrogation; thereafter appearance before Magistrate for bail consideration.

Apple a Day Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs State of Kerala — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2010 / 11TH JYAISTHA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 2693 of 2010()

¶6

----------------------------CRIME NO.485/2010 OF PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION

¶7

PETITIONERS

¶8

¶9

APPLE A DAY PROPERTIES PVT.LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT WITH ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT APPLE TOWER, N.H.BYE-PASS, PALARIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY P.O., COCHIN-24.

¶10

K.A.SAJU, MANAGING DIRECTOR, APPLE A DAY PROPERTIES PVT.LTD., APPLE TOWER, N.H.BYE-PASS, PALARIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY P.O., COCHIN-24.

¶11

RAJEEVKUMAR CHERUVARA, DIRECTOR, APPLE A DAY PROPERTIES PVT.LTD., APPLE TOWER, N.H.BYE-PASS, PALARIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY P.O., COCHIN-24.

¶12

BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.P.PRIJITH

¶13

RESPONDENT(S):

¶14

--------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶15

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.TEK CHAND

¶16

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶18

====================== B.A. No.2693 of 2010

¶19

====================== Dated: 01.06.2010

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No. 485 of 2010 of Palarivattom Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 406,420 and 120B I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

¶22

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶23

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 09.06.2010 or on 10.06.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter appear before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated by the Police, shall consider and dispose of their application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶24

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶25

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶26

Apple a Day Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Apple a Day Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalu Vs State of Kerala

Saji Vs State of Kerala

A.K.Abdul Azeez & Another Vs State of Kerala & Others

Thomas and Another Vs State of Kerala

Noushad.P.E Vs S.I. of Police, Pathanamthitta

Alexander Valiyaveettil John Vs State of Kerala